Federal prosecutors failed to convince jurors that Roger Clemens was guilty

Names of twelve individuals (four men and eight women) that belonged to jury at the case against the athlete Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government wanted the jury to be convinced that the athlete had lied before the Congress about administration of steroids and HGH. But since the jury didn’t believe it, the government criticized the persons that acted as the jury. Certain persons who composed the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf kids, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy were belonged to the jury.
The political activist Joyce Robinson-Paul was interviewed by the New York Daily News several days after the verdict. She affirmed that the jury comprehended that they had to be fair to both the federal prosecutors and the sportsperson. But they didn’t find anything that had to be prosecuted.  Later she also noticed that the government couldn’t prove their statements.
Bradford Weaver, an employee of the Canadian Embassy claimed that the government acted wrongly. He noted that such cases should not happen again. This person also noticed that there was nothing to be pursued. This person was interviewed by the Associated Press. He also noticed that each juror understood from the very beginning that Roger Clemens was not guilty of any charge. This person confirmed that each juror was unanimous.
The employee of the Canadian Embassy was also asked whether he thought that Roger Clemens really applied steroids. Journalists of the Associated Press also asked him whether he considered that the governmental case against the athlete represented just the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But he refused to answer the questions.
Another juror who chose not to be named noticed that the jurors didn’t understand how the government could spend essential sums of money during five years in order to prosecute the athlete. This person noticed that it was impossible to comprehend why the prosecution took place 5 years.
Other jurors didn’t provide any information.
As for feds, they were wholly disappointed. They refused to respond to the affirmations pronounced by the jurors.