California legislators asked to Congress to review actions of anti-doping agencies

Legislators of California confirm that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspersons suspected of steroid use. So, athletes that have never tested positive for any banned medicines are investigated. That’s why the lawmakers initiated a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office promotes fighting against application of forbidden drugs. Its goal is to eradicate illicit manufacture and drug use, crimes connected with application of illegal medicines, etc.
The request of California lawmakers was initiated soon after the cyclist Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime suspension from professional sports.
Everybody knows that the former cyclist Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his 7 titles acquired at Tour de France. He was also suspended from competitions entirely.
Summer Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, confirming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t agree to accept the lawsuit. He confirmed that the USADA acted appropriately. He also said that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from sportspersons who apply prohibited remedies.
California Senator Michael Rubio affirmed that the judge didn’t do correctly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators affirmed that the USADA violated rights of certain athletes. That’s why they presented the request before Congress.

Barry Bonds realizes how athletes accused of steroid use feel

Barry Bonds knows what a sportsperson experiences, if he/she is pursued by the government and anti-doping officials. He realizes what this person feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspersons accused of doping. Thus, Barry Bonds supports the cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a reporter asked Barry Bonds about troubles of Lance Armstrong connected with doping accusations. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He claimed that Lance Armstrong was the most excellent cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Of course, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He knows what it means to be a good cyclist. After he retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in certain competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, he sees that this sport has the same issues like baseball. He comprehends that cyclists are targeted by the government and anti-doping officers like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were investigated by feds and anti-doping officers.
Feds accused Barry Bonds of lying about usage of banned products and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the sportsperson lied about administration of banned products. But feds affirmed that he was guilty of obstructing justice. Barry Bonds decided to appeal the decision of the court.
As for Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to pursue the cyclist. The USADA confirmed that Lance Armstrong had been using banned medicines throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to discontinue fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He forfeited his Tour de France titles and money he had won at these events.
Although Lance Armstrong lost his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They confirm that he is the most wonderful cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors haven’t stopped to support his cancer charity. The former cyclist helps people to combat cancer. So, numerous individuals are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by accusations related to administration of prohibited medicines. The former baseball player thinks that his achievements during the baseball career are more essential than the accusations. He believes that people will forget about the accusations and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk didn’t take steroid intentionally

Nadezya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics. But she failed a drug test. As a result, she was stripped of the medal which was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests indicated presence of a steroid’s metabolites in her urine samples.
When an athlete is caught using any forbidden substances, he/she is usually sentenced to a ban of two years. When it comes to Nadezya Ostapchuk, she received one-year suspension. Why was the sentence lighter? There were several circumstances that proved the following condition: the shop putter didn’t apply any banned medicine knowingly.
At the beginning the shot putter blamed his former coach. She confirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency examined this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also participated in the investigation. It was defined that Yefimov was guilty. This person put powder of methenolone into food of Nadezya Ostapchuk during the last week before the 2012 London Olympics. The coach affirmed that he had worried about Nadezya Ostapchuk. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to determine why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the problem.
Anti-doping officials accepted these arguments. That’s why the Belarusian shot putter was sentenced just to one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not taken the steroid intentionally. They claimed that Yefimov just tried to protect Nadezya Ostapchuk. They said that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If the Belarusian shot putter’s performance was amazing certain months before the 2012 Summer Olympics, her coach had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Girlfriends of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Lance Armstrong were asked about sexual abilities of these athletes

Several sportspersons that are accused of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost anything in order to define whether several athletes have applied any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is spent to learn even private life of athletes. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can reveal the truth about administration of banned medicines. Thus, girlfriends of certain sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been reported that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about several aspects connected with private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this baseball player. She claimed that the athlete’s testicles were shrunken. So, her affirmations served as a proof that Barry Bonds applied steroids and/or other banned medications.
It is known that testicular atrophy belongs to adverse reactions of certain steroids. Thus, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that anyone has administered some banned substances. Steroid users may prevent this negative result, if they administer certain medicines for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former baseball player had suffered from erectile dysfunctions. The singer noted that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during application of steroids. But if you study information about unwanted consequences of steroids more attentively, you can understand that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of application. It happens because natural production of testosterone is normally suppressed by intake of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such products that can restore natural testosterone production, erectile dysfunctions can be prevented.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also targeted by federal prosecutors. But questions are not revealed. According to several suppositions, she might have been asked also about sexual abilities of the 7-time Tour de France winner.
Actually, the government has a mistaken opinion in this case. However testicular atrophy and erectile dysfunctions may occur on account of steroid use, these arguments are not proper.

Don Hooton educates youth and adults that steroids are dangerous

Several medicines are named “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these medicines represent? Why have been they called “performance-enhancing”? Various people may have different definitions. Let mention what a teenager believes! Before presenting her opinion it is necessary to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, experienced serious depression after intake of steroids. Ultimately, he committed suicide. He wanted to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other prominent sportspersons that have applied steroids. But his death came suddenly. His sister confirms that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous preparations. They are called “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young individuals that want to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, established a foundation to teach youth about dangers related to steroids. He describes which risks are associated with intake of anabolic steroids and other related medications. He also utilizes slideshow presentations in order to explain that these products can cause such unwanted consequences, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver dysfunctions, etc.
Don Hooton tries to educate young individuals about dangerous risks related to administration of steroids. But he admits that it is difficult. He affirms that numerous young persons take doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they want to look like them. They follow their examples in order to change appearance and have more strength.
Unfortunately, several parents believe that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them think that their daughters don’t use steroids because these products are recommended to get muscles and body weight in general. But according to several sources, girls also apply steroids. They apply these medicines in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also used to burn fat. That’s why grown-ups also should be educated about effects of steroids. Moreover, certain parents believe that their children don’t apply steroids because these products are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to get steroids for a cycle.
It is considered that each16th high school student takes steroids. But this opinion is mistaken. Every 16th high school student admits to administering doping products.   But the most of young people hide that they administer these drugs.
Those that listen to Don Hooton’s explanations about steroids express their thanks. They are happy that they get knowledge about these products.

Arguments against usage of steroids in sports are weak

Everybody knows that anabolic steroids are often blamed. If a sportsperson or a bodybuilder takes steroids and/or other performance-enhancing drugs, he/she is considered to be a cheater. Journalists report about such sportspersons as about those who have spoiled their reputation. Anti-doping officials put incredible efforts and spend money in other to determine whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that certain sportspersons have taken steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is confirmed that those who dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Numerous articles describe the fight against steroids. But let think whether arguments against administration of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to apply them.
It is affirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for kids and young individuals. It is known that youth sees many sports stars that administer steroids and other related products. As a result, young people want to look and be as strong, as these celebrated sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely discussed about health dangers connected with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can notice that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most spread arguments against administration of anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
According to the first argument, intake of steroids is closely associated with several possible health dangers. Many articles warn about testicular atrophy and enlarged heart which may occur on account of steroid use. Although it may be true, let analyze our life. We eat unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Certain persons use antidepressants that are also very dangerous. We do also other unhealthy things.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using athletes have unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they improve performance with these products. Let pay attention what happens in other fields, for example, in the world of entertainment.  A lot of actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play some roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of some surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to bans.
While it is affirmed that steroid-using athletes send bad messages to young people who want to look like them and follow their examples, no one mentions about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also desire to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal prosecutors pursue sportspeople that administer steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act like steroid-using athletes.
It is clear that arguments against usage of steroids are quite weak. They show hypocrisy which reigns in our fake world.

Belarusian shot putter Nadzeya Ostapchuk used metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But the athlete forfeited the award because she tested positive for the steroid metenolone (methenolone). She provided two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read news related to steroid use in sports, you must know that professional sportspeople and bodybuilders are usually caught taking other steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught administering metenolone. It is strange, according to statements of anti-doping officers. What does this prohibited medicine represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily administer this drug for enhancement of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It possesses slight androgenic features. It acts like testosterone, enhancing muscle mass and adding endurance.
Although this medicine possesses just mild androgenic nature, it leads to development of sex male features in women. Women that use this remedy may face common signs of masculinization: the voice becomes deeper; hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This anabolic steroid can be applied orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) benefits greatly, when it is administered by sportspersons during their trainings. It is not applied during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is applied just on the day of a competition.
It is also stated that it is easy to catch those who take this anabolic steroid.
Unwanted reactions of Metenolone (Methenolone) hinge upon dosages which are used. They include water retention, elevated calcium level in the blood, bone growth, excessive hair growth on the body, acne, hair loss, menstrual abnormalities, enhanced sex drive, etc.
So, when you see a female athlete that has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may suspect her of steroid use. Actually, it is wrong because these problems may occur also in those women who don’t apply any steroids. But sometimes these effects display that certain female athletes use drugs that possess androgenic features.

Australian doctor promoted using steroids by bodybuilders/athletes

Several physician abuse their position, prescribing medicines that don’t meet criteria of medical needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that some preparations are considered to be prescription preparations. It means that you can’t purchase them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating doctor. Anabolic steroids belong to such drugs. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in some countries. Those that do it may be punished. They may be sentenced to prison and/or fine. Of course, many individuals are looking for ways to buy and use these medications without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are widely abused. Many sportspersons and bodybuilders apply these products not for therapeutic needs but for enhancement of performance. If they live in countries where these preparations can’t be purchased legally without prescriptions, they find some ways to mask their illicit purchase and intake. Sportspersons, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their health care providers to prescribe them these drugs, as if they had therapeutic needs to apply them. Thus, certain doctors promote selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a case.
Peter Grant, an Australian health care provider, recommended steroids to 14 persons during 9 years. Medical state of these individuals didn’t require intake of these medications. Thus, the physician was accused of inappropriate practicing medicine. For example, he prescribed to a patient taking such preparations, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to recommend these medicines to this individual. Furthermore, these medications were prescribed him during 9 years.
The health care provider Peter Grant acknowledged that several patients were competing. Thus, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to reading scientific information about anabolic steroids. He claimed that he knew how steroids worked. Thus, he supervised the patients who took anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects in consideration, it is possible to state that the doctor Peter Grant was better known by those that took steroids for performance-enhancing effects than by those who had to be cured from some health troubles. Peter Grant claimed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients just for personal usage.
When the physician appeared in the court, the judge affirmed that the physician promoted selling steroids. The judge added that Peter Grant had to be punished properly. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for one year. Furthermore, the judge confirmed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Feds planned to question Sheryl Crow about alleged doping of Lance Armstrong

Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had administered EPO and other forbidden medicines.
Numerous persons provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation connected with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the athlete was also targeted. She had to appear in the court. Several sports writers claimed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
The athlete Lance Armstrong and the musician Sheryl Crow were considered to be one of the most famous couples. They spent much time together. Sheryl Crow lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. She travelled with Lance Armstrong during his trainings. They were engaged, when the cyclist won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton claimed that Lance Armstrong had administered prohibited drugs. They also stated that the cyclist had been the leader of a doping team. Furthermore, they noticed that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment utilized for application of banned medications. These persons were going to testify against the 7-time winner of tour de France. They claimed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times with the help of banned products.
When it comes to Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the 7-time Tour de France winner was dropped before the hearing.
While the government dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former athlete. As a result, Lance Armstrong forfeited his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Luckily, his charity against cancer was not affected at all. Sponsors continue to support Lance Armstrong and donate. However his titles are lost, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many people that fight against cancer.

Is Derek Jeter doper?

The sports journalist Skip Bayless accuses the baseball player Derek Jeter of steroid use. He has expressed his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
Actually, the ESPN2 journalist doesn’t have any evidence in order to suggest that Derek Jeter administers banned products. Despites this fact, the affirmations of the ESPN2 journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of steroid use, the reporter started to criticize anti-doping program of the MLB. He confirmed that the MLB’s tests for banned preparations are not sophisticated enough to catch those that apply prohibited drugs.
Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view connected with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test which is used in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to catch those who administer prohibited drugs. Instead of this method, it is necessary to use another. Carbon isotope ratio is more sophisticated.
The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless also confirmed that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this preparation is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this drug should be performed more times throughout year. Under other circumstances, players may apply this product and avoid detection.
So, Skip Bayless thinks that Derek Jeter administers HGH and banned drugs. The ESPN2 journalist also confirms that if he were a baseball player, he would take HGH.
Thus, the ESPN2 journalist supposes that MLB players apply HGH and probably other banned medications without being detected by the anti-doping system.
It goes without saying that the steroid era in baseball is not over. Professional baseball players use various prohibited medications and remain undetectable. But no one can accuse an athlete of steroid use, basing just on unsophisticated drug testing. It is important to focus on facts, accusing a person of intake of banned medicines. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Melky Cabrera attempted to escape from suspension resulted from his positive for testosterone

It happens often that when sportspersons test positive for any banned medications, they try to prove that they have never taken any prohibited medication intentionally. They are looking for various ways to demonstrate that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to prevent bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The professional baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Of course, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other athletes he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and escape from the suspension.
Numerous doping sportspeople that are caught affirm that they have taken a dietary supplement that led to positive for certain forbidden substance. Although several sportspersons may have taken fake dietary supplements, a lot of athletes administer steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in numerous cases.
So, Melky Cabrera claimed that he had applied a dietary supplement which caused his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a hoax. Trying to avoid the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements that promoted selling it. The product didn’t exist in reality. It was just a lie of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. So, Melky Cabrera was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES had also problems. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were accused of involving in the hoax. But these individuals affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the web site and the lie which was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been involved in this lie.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is unclear yet whether other individuals would be also pursued and sanctioned for the hoax.

Sydney Morning Herald newspaper: prostitutes in Bangladesh administer anabolic steroids

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained 4 individuals that had the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam intended to smuggle these medicines to Bangladesh. The medications were seized and these men were arrested.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper reported about this case, claiming that four individuals were detained while they desired to traffic steroids that were intended for intake by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This report surprised a lot of persons. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper mean? Do prostitutes administer the same preparations like athletes and bodybuilder who try to improve their performance, increasing muscle size and strength? Why do prostitutes use anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Certain persons understood that it was wrong to write that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Undoubtedly, prostitutes don’t apply anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes use corticosteroids that differ from anabolic steroids totally. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They can enhance performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids help to gain muscle mass and reduce fat deposits, corticosteroids promote wasting muscles and increase body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids administered by prostitutes. Those who take this medicine look healthier and more attractive. So, such prostitutes that use this medication have more clients.
A prostitute that applies Orexadon claims that she is able to serve up to 15 clients a day.
Thus, it is possible to assure that prostitutes don’t take anabolic steroids that are commonly indicated for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more proper drugs for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a false report. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t try to smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

General indications linked with recovery after steroid cycles

When you buy steroids for cycles, you should also get such medicines that must be applied to receive recovery after application of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts over 8 weeks, HCG should be taken during the cycle. It is important to take into account that this preparation is administered only during steroid cycles.
There such preparations that should be taken after steroid use. For example, Clomid should be administered after steroid use. It is needed to start administering this remedy after androgen levels fall substantially and recovery with this product becomes possible. It is usually advised to start applying Clomid with a high dose (300 mg/day) and lower it gradually till 50 mg a day. Then low quantities are taken until steroid users are sure that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their ordinary size.
If Clomid is taken about 6 weeks and no improvement is observed, it is necessary to interrupt administration of this remedy. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is recommended to continue applying Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to apply this remedy a year. Several studies have displayed that prolonged usage of this medicine doesn’t result in severe problems. However several individuals may experience vision troubles because of Clomid, these troubles are not irreversible. They disappear after discontinuation of intake. If any negative effects linked with vision system appear in those that apply Clomid, they must discontinue using this preparation.
Clomid may be also used after steroid use. A normal dosage is 75 mg/day in such situations.
Although there are such medicines that help to get recovery after steroid cycles and maintain strength and muscle gains, it is not a good idea to apply long-term steroid cycles.

Similar and different features of Clomid and Nolvadex

Numerous individuals often ask which medicine is more appropriate for a PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex. While certain steroid users believe that Clomid is better for this need, others claim that Nolvadex is more suitable. Certain persons claim that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you evaluate structures of these medications, you may see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have several similar characteristics. But the most of people and even specialists believe that Clomid and Nolvadex are entirely different medications. Which basis does this opinion have? These preparations are used in medicine for different purposes. Nolvadex is indicated for treatment of breast cancer in women. When it comes to Clomid, it is administered in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are entirely various products.
In fact, they may be also used for different purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is advised in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is ordinarily used as an anti-estrogen drug.
Comparing potency of these products, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex have capacity to reduce estrogen levels, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater quantities of testosterone.
When it comes to dosages of these medications, they differ because one of them is more powerful than another. Clomid should be used in more enhanced measures. So, such doses of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, lead to greater benefits than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most powerful anti-estrogen. Such medications, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are ordinarily used in case of gynecomastia.
When you try to choose which medication you should administer: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account certain aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noted, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these advantages, Nolvadex is safer. Moreover, Nolvadex causes less severe undesirable consequences than Clomid because lower measures are needed to produce wanted results. Moreover, while side consequences of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of usage. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to keep more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, consumers of steroids can make their choice properly.