What does Tom Verducci think about doping?

The American sportswriter Tom Verducci says about debates related to rughts of steroid users to be chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it commonly happens, this explanation manifests only confusion of writers about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA)  is a professional association of baseball journalists that chose players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All sportswriters who are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have opportunity to elect up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently a debate took place between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or only suspected consumers of steroids and other prohibited medications might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually should comment their votes:  they have to explain why they have voted pro or contra certain issues. Some of them confirm that doping destructs the integrity of sports and intake of prohibited products is frequently considered by them to be immoral.
As for Verducci, he doesn’t think that usage of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This sportswriter assures that steroids help consumers to take unfair advantage over those who don’t administrate prohibited medications. According to this sportswriter, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Thus, administration of banned medications promotes unfairness in sports.  That’s why Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. This sportswriter confirms that it is a question that is connected with performance but not to morality. So, Tom Verducci suggests that consumers of steroids should not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for Jeff Bagwell, an admitted steroid user. This sportsperson has acknowledged that he had taken androstenedione. It is necessary to mention that this medicine was not enumerated among anabolic steroids, when Bagwell administrated it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is enumerated among banned drugs. Since it wasn’t legally clamed to be a steroid, Tom Verducci decided to vote for the user of this medicine; however, it was always claimed to be an anabolic-androgenic steroid by scientists. Furthermore, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t induce his performance due to administration of androstenedione.
Nevertheless, the decision of Tom Verducci to vote for the admitted consumer of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Tom Verducci is not against usage of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by athletes?”  Since Tom Verducci doesn’t believe that doping is a moral question, he may suppose that enhancement of performance is not a real problem.
Many persons suggest that administration of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.